Friday, September 26, 2014

Is Sandy Brown a carpetbagger?

Former pastor will compete for City Council seat in North Seattle | Politics Northwest | Seattle Times
Yes, I think he is.
Sandy Brown has an impressive list of experiences doing things other places, and for things that tangentially have applicability to being a city councilmember.
He will have to make the effort to connect his experience to that things the voters in Seattle's 5th Council District are concerned about, because I just don't see it.

Former pastor will compete for City Council seat in North Seattle

http://blogs.seattletimes.com/politicsnorthwest/2014/09/25/former-pastor-will-compete-for-city-council-seat-in-north-seattle/

Sanford "Sandy" Brown needs a new pair of hiking boots.

The former Methodist pastor, who announced his candidacy Thursday for the Seattle City Council, has walked more than 2,200 miles in Europe since 2008, and he now says he's going to walk every street in the newly drawn 5th District.

Brown, 56, trekked across Italy and Spain while writing a walking guidebook called "The Way of St. Francis: From Florence to Assisi to Rome." He did that while leading Seattle's First United Methodist Church, a post he left this spring.

"Something that I love about European cities is that when you get to the heart of them, they're very walkable," he said. "I'm working on the idea of walking (the 5th District) over the next months — every street."

Brown joins Planned Parenthood political organizer Halei Watkins, 26, in the race for the 5th District seat as the council moves to representation based on geographic districts for its 2015 elections.

He hasn't lived very long in the district, which includes the neighborhoods of Maple Leaf, Lake City, Bitter Lake and Broadview.

Brown moved to the Licton Springs neighborhood in March from Capitol Hill. Licton Springs sits surrounded by Aurora Avenue North, Interstate 5, North 85th Street and Northgate Way.

None of the council's nine current members live in the 5th District, making it a particularly attractive seat for new candidates. Brown and Watkins are expecting additional people to run.

Brown grew up in White Center and says his parents were blue-collar workers. He earned a bachelor's degree from the University of Washington, a master's degree from Garrett Theological Seminary and a doctorate from Princeton Theological Seminary, according to a campaign news release.

The father of two raised his sons in Seattle, Fall City, Kirkland and Wenatchee as he moved from one church to another.

Been back in Seattle since 2001, Brown has served as executive director of the Church Council of Greater Seattle, helped found the Committee to End Homelessness in King County and helped run a homeless shelter at his church, he says.

Two issues he wants to tackle at City Hall are homelessness and sidewalks.

North Seattle has two-thirds of the city's streets without sidewalks, and that needs to change, Brown says.

He says City Hall shouldn't keep trying to solve Seattle's homelessness problem by building supportive housing. The focus should be on expanding the city's shelter system, Brown says.

During the 2012 push for marriage equality in Washington, Brown "publicly criticized his denomination for its failure to affirm marriage equality and took the step of performing same-sex wedding ceremonies at his church, in protest of rules against same-sex marriage," his news release says.

He chairs the board of the Center for Gun Responsibility, a nonprofit created in May to advocate for expanded background checks and other gun control measures. Brown says he'll now campaign full-time.

"I don't know my opponent," he said about Watkins. "I haven't met her before … What I'm going to be doing is not contrasting myself with other candidates but sharing with people what my background is. I'd be surprised and delighted if someone else came forward with the amount of experience I have."

I'll be surprised and delighted if his experience had any more value in this context than Halei Watkins' experience.

There isn't a front runner, yet.

Tuesday, September 23, 2014

Licata says if he runs for council it's at-large

Licata says if he runs in 2015, it will be at-large | Crosscut.com
Maybe Nick Licata can win against Tim Burgess or Sally Clark, maybe he knows for sure that he would lose to Mike Ă“Brien.

There is still only one candidate for the 5th District, Halie Watkins. It is hard to believe Watkins would run unopposed for an open council seat. We will just have to wait and see.

There are potentially three candidates running at-large. It is very likely that more people jump into those two races. Sally Bagshaw, too, could draw challengers.

Licata says if he runs in 2015, it will be at-large
If the long-time councilmember does run for one of the two at-large seats, he would have to compete against two of his current colleagues.

Longtime Seattle City Councilmember Nick Licata says that he will make a decision in January about whether to run for re-election in 2015.

Licata told Crosscut yesterday that if he does run, it will be for one of the two at-large seats available under the City Council's new election system, which is partially district-based. Council President Tim Burgess and Councilmember Sally Clark have already filed paperwork with the Seattle Ethics and Elections Commission to campaign for the at-large seats. This means that if Licata does decide to run, he would find himself in a competitive race against a colleague, which could get even more complicated if candidates from outside the Council emerge.

Licata and O'Brien both reside in Council District 6, which includes north Seattle neighborhoods such as Green Lake, Fremont and Ballard. By running at-large, or not running at all, Licata would avoid a race against his district-mate. The two are generally regarded as among the most liberal members of the council.

Apart from Burgess, Clark, Licata and O'Brien, the other five council members have registered to campaign for four-year terms in their newly established districts. Charter Amendment 19, which passed in last year's city election, ushered in the new district election system for the Council. 

North Seattle's Council District 5, which includes Lake City and Northgate, is the only district in which no current council member lives. Halei Watkins, a Planned Parenthood organizer, has registered to run for that seat.

In his West Seattle district, Tom Rasmussen already faces two challengers, David Ishii and Charles R. Redmond III. And community activist Tammy Morales is planning to run against Bruce Harrell in District 2, which encompasses Southeast Seattle.

Licata says if he runs in 2015, it will be at-large | Crosscut.com

http://crosscut.com/2014/09/23/politics-government/122015/licata-2015-ill-decide-january/

Wednesday, September 10, 2014

Publicola: Halei Watkins, announced her candidacy for North Seattle's new city council District 5

SDOT Director Addresses War on Cars | Seattle Politics | Seattle Met
We have a candidate!

See her site here: http://www.haleiwatkins.com

SDOT Director Addresses War on Cars | Seattle Politics | Seattle Met

http://www.seattlemet.com/news-and-profiles/publicola/articles/morning-fizz-septemberbeyondthecar-2014

Morning Fizz: Beyond the Car



 3. Planned Parenthood organizer and former field director for 2012's gay marriage law, Halei Watkins, announced her candidacy for North Seattle's new city council District 5 seat this morning. 

District 5 includes Maple Leaf, Lake City, Broadview, and Watkins' neighborhood, Northgate.  No City Council members currently live in the 5th, under Seattle's brand new districted system. 

"I'm running because I believe that Seattle is quickly becoming the tale of two cities: one city for the wealthy and one for the rest of us.  Like many Seattleites, my husband and I wonder if we will be able to afford to continue to live here, to raise a family here, to grow here," Watkins said in a press statement. 

Watkins husband Jaret is a grocery worker and member of UFCW Local 21, the leftiest union in town.


Friday, August 15, 2014

Chamber of Commerce is planning on being an active player in Seattle District Elections

Chamber Plans for 2015 City Elections | Seattle Met
It will be hard to tell the difference, really. I suppose this is some kind of leverage they are holding over the incumbents that aren't socialists, and aren't actively doing whatever the Seattle Downtown Association wants.

The reality here in the 5th District is that the idea that whatever benefits downtown benefits the entire city was just dismissed by citizens voting for districts.

The other group looking to influence candidate selection and election will be the Democratic (and I suppose Republican) state parties.
The state LD's are breeding grounds for political insiders, and in the case of our local county district representative, inbreeding.

That whole system creates incumbents by appointment, rather than open elections.

The 2015 elections, especially in the 5th, are one of the few chances for anybody not inside somebody's system to run for an open seat.

That uncertainty is likely to make people that are used to having their way do some fairly extreme things to keep control of the city council.

Chamber Plans for 2015 City Elections


The Civic Alliance for a Sound Economy, the political arm of the Seattle-King County Chamber of Commerce, held a closed-door "business leaders' luncheon" today to discuss, among other things, "Rumors and Lies: Who will run for City Council in 2015?," "Policy and political plans for 2015 district elections," and "Campaign infrastructure, candidate recruitment, communication strategy, fundraising, [and] district partnerships." 

The group reportedly didn't name many specific potential candidates, but they did make it clear that they want to see the entire council get strong challengers—or, at the very least, to hold off on contributing to incumbents, who the Chamber usually supports, until they're assured the council has the chamber's back. (Read the rest here: http://www.seattlemet.com/news-and-profiles/publicola/articles/chamber-plans )








Saturday, August 9, 2014

The heavy handed and offensive rhetoric used by proponents is a long-lasting mistake



I did not vote in favor of this effort to create a Metropolitan Parks District. I expected a majority would not agree with me. I didn't expect to be insulted by the proponents with such a gross mischaracterization. 
But that's exactly what happened, and I'm not likely to every forgive and forget it.

Without the least bit of irony rumor blog Publicola chose to dislike something they facilitated.
Here is the dislike:
3. I DISLIKE that the "yes" side of the parks campaign is creating a narrative that the "No" vote is the result of some kind of Tea Bagger-Eyman-Seattle Times plot. Lots of people were honestly skeptical of the governance structure that relies on the city council as the governing body. Defenses like saying that the council already votes on the parks budget only fueled skepticism about whether the council (the same council that fell all over itself to build the tunnel and is flummoxed by how to deal with housing) is up to the task of running another taxing district.

Seattle Primary Election Results | Seattle Politics | Seattle Met


Here is an opinion piece by Michael Maddux they they posted that goes out of its way to paint opposition as part of a Tim Eyman mindset.
How Park District Opponents Channel Tim Eyman

Here is Publicola's editorial:

Isn't It Weird That: The Times "Loves" Parks, But...


I can't remember the last time I have read a Seattle Times editorial, and I don't know that can remember agreeing with their reasoning for just about anything. But this was Publicola's frame at work.

And here is the Publicola reader poll, note how different it is from the voter poll.

The risk any candidate takes is conflating the desire of citizens that prefer to vote for some specific things with people that want to be able to vote down every specific thing.
The folks that framed this as an "us" against against "them", as if Seattle were Missouri, may have insulted voters that are both Democrats and democratic.
Representative democracy begins with setting and executing policy as well as budgets for such things. Some folks fear that an abuse of power and position leads to waste and abuse.

For the TEA (Taxed Enough Already) Party, they want to control and kill everything that moves within government, and prefer making it as difficult as possible for people to participate in government (including the Right to Vote), and actively stop government when elected.

For everybody else there is a broad spectrum of people wanting various degrees if representative and direct democracy. Seattle has had a very long and distinguished history of democrat activists wanting direct democracy, not to kill something TEA Party style, but to ensure that a given thing that is so personal and precious isn't diminish by broad political desires of representatives tasked with broad responsibilities, by using something specifically important to them, like libraries, trading away part of it to gain something somewhere else.

Plenty of people wanted a Metropolitan Parks District, but not run by the same people with broad political relationships as the city council obviously has. This was obviously stated in commenters in Publicola, the Stranger, and even the Seattle Times that it was shockingly tone deaf for proponents to paint all opposition the way that they did.
Were they afraid of an independently elected body would make independent decisions?
That's what it looks like.

The heavy handed rhetoric used by insiders that benefit from back scratching will not be quickly forgotten, it just never really is.
That's as much a part of Seattle as is activist democrats.

Do all of these people think that 46% of the voters in Seattle are TEA Party folks?
That's darn near the percentage of people the voted for Mike McGinn in last year's mayoral race. Maybe McGinn is a closet TEA Partier.

[edited to update with a chart from The Economist]


I doesn't really matter if the endorsers do or do not support the rhetoric supporting that side of the campaign because they endorsed a campaign that did.
Own it.

Public Officials:
Seattle Mayor Ed Murray
Councilmember Sally Bagshaw
Councilmember Bruce Harrell
Councilmember Jean Godden
Councilmember Mike O'Brien
Councilmember Nick Licata
Councilmember Sally Clark
Councilmember Tim Burgess
Councilmember Tom Rasmussen
State Senator David Frockt
State Senator Jeanne Kohl-Welles
State Representative Brady Walkinshaw
State Representative Jessyn Farrell
State Representative Gerry Pollet
State Representative Ruth Kagi
King County Executive Dow Constantine
King County Councilmember Rod Dembowski
King County Councilmember Larry Gossett
King County Councilmember Larry Phillips
King County Councilmember Joe McDermott
Former Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn
Former Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels
Former Seattle Mayor Paul Schell
Former Seattle Mayor Norman B. Rice
Former Seattle Mayor Charles Royer
Former Councilmember Richard Conlin
Former Councilmember Peter Steinbrueck
Former King County Executive Ron Sims
Congressman Adam Smith

Community Organizations
11th District Democrats
32nd District Democrats
34th District Democrats
36th District Democrats
37th District Democrats
43rd District Democrats
Alliance for Pioneer Square
Allied Arts of Seattle
Arboretum Foundation
Aquarium Foundation
Berger Partnership
Cascade Bicycle Club
Downtown Residents Council
Downtown Seattle Association
Earth Corps
ECOSS (Environmental Coalition of South Seattle)
El Centro de la Raza
Feet First
Forterra
Freeway Park Association
Friends of Athletic Fields
Friends of the Seattle Waterfront  
Friends of Seattle's Olmsted Parks
Green Plate Special       
Groundswell NW
IBEW 46
Imagine Permaculture Food Forest
King County Conservation Voters
King County Democrats
King County Young Democrats
Laborers Local 1239
Municipal League of King County
Martin Luther King County Labor Council 
Nature Consortium  
Neighborhood House
North Central Little League
Northwest Ultimate Association
Nube9
Professional and Technical Employees, Local 17
Recreational Adult Team Soccer (RATS)
Sierra Club
Senior Services
Seward Park Audubon Center
Seattle Fire Fighters Union, Local 27
Seattle Human Services Coalition
Seattle Neighborhood Greenways 
Seattle Parks Foundation
Seattle Tilth
Seattle United FC
Seattle Youth Lacrosse Club
Seattle Youth Soccer Association
Skate Like a Girl
South Park Neighborhood Association
South Park Area Redevelopment Committee (SPARC) 
Southwest Youth and Family Services
Student Conservation Association, Northwest Region
Teamsters Local 117
Transportation Choices Coalition
Trust for Public Land
United Association Local 32 - Plumbers and Pipefitters
Urban Sparks
Volunteer Park Trust
Walker Macy
Washington Bus
Washington Conservation Voters
Washington State Council of County & 
City Employees PAC
Washington Bikes
Washington Trails Association
Washington Wildlife and Recreation Coalition
West Seattle Green Spaces Coalition
Woodland Park Zoological Society

Wednesday, August 6, 2014

Seattle Prop 1 Parks District likely to pass

It looks like this will pass, as of 8/6/2014.
Here is a link to the KC Elections page for this measure.

What will be interesting will be the by precinct voting data showing how Seattle's 5th voted. Data will be available in a few weeks.

Now that this is a parks district where each council member participates, rather than a council sub-committee made up of 3 members and alternates, every candidate will have to express a city-wide as well as a district specific vision for what is being grouped together as "parks".

Friday, August 1, 2014

Two or four more names floating around for the 5th CD seat in Seattle

Today's Publicola Likes and Dislikes provided more names to the rapidly deepening pool of almost-candidates for Seattle City Council Position 5.

Since I do not know who the source of this rumor comes from I have to just treat it as a consultant or political party hack floating names.

"I like that the speculation of who will run for Seattle City Council in the 5th District [North Seattle] includes not only rumors of Jordan Royer and David Miller running again, but also murmuring that their wives Julianna Ross and Donna Hartmann-Miller would be welcome candidates."

Seattle Metropolitan Parks District in Trouble | Seattle Politics | Seattle Met

http://www.seattlemet.com/news-and-profiles/publicola/articles/morning-fizz-high-strung-friday-fizz-august-2014

Who are these people? Um, not sure, so here is a random list of stuff on the internet that I am pretty sure is about these people.

Jordan Royer is interested in boats and water for a living.

Here is his LinkedIn profile:

Jordan Royer | LinkedIn



David Miller ran for city council in 2009, I thought I would repost endorsements from his candidate page here before it gets scrubbed (imagine him 5 years older).



But wait, there's more.
Here is David Milker's Facebook page where he states that he is a Politician.

David Miller

David Miller is committed to making Seattle's economy stronger and greener, its streets safer, and its government more responsive to its citizens.

About Me

David is a Washington native who has lived in Seattle for over 20 years and in District 5 for over 17 years . He married his college sweetheart, Donna Hartmann-Miller, in 1993. David and Donna live in the Maple Leaf neighborhood. 
David grew up in Hoquiam, a small town on the Washington coast. His mother, Rachel, was a grade school teacher's aide for many years at Washington Grade School. His father, Jack, retired after 42 years of service from Grays Harbor Paper Company. Jack was one of the co-founders of the AWPPW union as a shift worker, and eventually served as the mill's Industrial Relations and Personnel Manager. David manages the Rachel and Jack Miller Memorial Scholarship Fund benefiting Hoquiam High School students in their name.

Favorite Quotations

"Whatever anybody says or does, assume positive intent." - Indra Nooyi, CEO, Pepsico 
"First, always ask for the order. Second, when the customer says 'yes', stop talking - Michael Bloomberg

"If you're not living on the edge, you are already dead." - American Indian saying

Work Info

EmployerBiotech Stock Research, LLC

PositionFounder

Time Period1999 to 2013

LocationSeattle, WA, United States

DescriptionBSR was an independent research firm covering publicly traded development-stage biotech companies for professional and individual investors. Founded 1999.

EmployerUniversity of Washington - Bothell

PositionAdjunct Professor

Time Period2000 to 2010

LocationSeattle, WA, United States

DescriptionCo-taught Entrepreneur's Workshop each spring. Formerly taught BBUS-301, Business Writing and Presentations. Over 100 businesses launched out of this program.

EmployerSeattle Parks and Green Spaces Levy Citizen Advisory Committee

PositionMember

Time PeriodApril 2008 to June 2008

LocationSeattle, WA, United States

DescriptionVolunteer Position. The Seattle Parks and Green Spaces Levy (PGSL) Citizen Advisory Committee was formed by the Seattle City Council to investigate the possibility of placing a parks levy on the ballot in 2008. After three months of debate, the PGSL recommended a $140 million package be placed on the ballot. This is a reduction from the $200 million ProParks levy expiring this year in recognition of the less trong economy facing Seattle residents.

EmployerAlpine BioVentures

PositionPortfolio Manager

Time Period2013 to present

LocationSeattle, WA, United States

DescriptionAlpine BioVentures invests in development-stage biotechnology companies working to cure cancer, heart disease, and childhood orphan diseases.

Activities

Biking, softball, volunteering in the neighborhood

Interests

Pedestrian safety, land use, local politics, good beer, parks and open space

Julianna Ross looks like she is living a full life doing important things so I'm not sure why she would take a thankless job like ay city council. But, you never know.

Experience

Executive Director

Sand Point Arts and Cultural Exchange
 – Present (1 year 8 months)Warren G. Magnuson Park

Continually advocate on behalf of arts, cultural and educational activities and facilities at Warren G. Magnuson Park to the benefit of the public. Maintain productive relationships with the City of Seattle, Seattle Parks & Recreation, City Council and any other official entities influencing the quality of life at the park. 

Conduct public outreach and build strong relationships with other regional arts and/or cultural facilities, neighborhood organizations, artists and the community at large. 

Develop and execute strategic plan, operating budget and programming goals. 
Establish operating procedures.
Maintain organization in compliance with 501(c)(3) laws and guidelines.
Cultivate funding sources including grants, individual giving and sponsorships.
Build relationships and strengthen partnerships across diverse groups.

Artists spread out in new 'gourmet' space at Magnuson Park

Artists spread out in new 'gourmet' space at Magnuson Park












Donna Hartman-Miller most likely rented videos to me about a decade ago before and after Reckless Video burns to the ground and my family moved to the other side of I-5. She works with David Miller for Ace Hardware next to Reckkess Video (the one that didn't burn to the ground).

I had nothing to do with the fire, other than be concerned and a little depressed.

Here is her LinkedIn profile, but that's not nearly as interesting (no offense) to a blog post about her from 2012.

In 2012 she was honored with something that is mentioned in the story, but the obvious thing here is that she is into cosplay.

See here, the story from 2012.

Magazine names Donna Hartmann-Miller as Maple Leaf's neighborhood hero

Maple Leaf now has a "neighborhood hero," named by Seattle magazine earlier this morning.

She's Donna Hartmann-Miller, shown here in her trademark Park Suit. (Photo courtesy Dane Doerflinger Photography.)

The magazine piece notes Donna is a member of the Maple Leaf Community Council (as is her husband, David Miller) and works at Maple Leaf Ace Hardware.

The ubiquitous Donna is also a force behind Friends for a Greater Maple Leaf Park (hence the Park Suit, which represents the park as it should be by this summer) and the annual Maple Leaf Parade of Costumes.

It's the first time the magazine has polled readers to find neighborhood heroes, and it didn't name any for neighborhoods where not enough residents voted.

Other heroes include Jeff Bezos and Phoenix Jones (as "superhero," natch).

You can read our interview with Donna here.


Some of that text just might be blue, or it might be links, whatever.
So, that makes 5 maybe names for city council.

Wednesday, July 30, 2014

SeattlePI reports that Rev. Sandy Brown my be a candidate for Seattle's 5th CD seat


Pastor, gun safety advocate likely to run for Seattle City Council - Strange Bedfellows — Politics News
From today's SeattlePI, Seattle City Council District 5 might have its first named candidate, Rev. Sandy Brown.

I wonder if he will call himself a political Independent.


Pastor, gun safety advocate likely to run for Seattle City Council


JOSHUA TRUJILLO / SEATTLEPI.COM
as the campaign for Initiative 594 is officially launched at First United Methodist Church in Seattle. If passed by voters, the initiative will expand background checks to all gun sales. 
The Rev. Sandy Brown, who recently stepped down as senior minister at Seattle First United Methodist Church, is "strongly leaning toward" running for the Seattle City Council in next year's new district based elections.
Brown would run from District 5 at the far north end of the Emerald City.
"I'm being encouraged by friends to run and I've arranged my employment to make it happen," Brown said in answering a Facebook query.  "I live in District 5 and am excited about the possibility of representing my district on the Council."
Brown is walking before making a final decision to run.
He has just finished hiking from Florence to Rome in Italy, research for a guidebook on the Way of St. Francis.  He expects to be home from the Eternal City and make a decision soon after Labor Day.
He also might want to walk off the I-594 current controversy.

Sunday, July 27, 2014

Advertisements are not endorsements, this isn't the Seattle Times or The Stranger.

I am not encouraging anybody to vote any particular way, at least not on Prop 1.

I'm conflicted. On this subject, I guess feelings could be pretty strong either way in Seattle's 5th CD.

"Where the guns are"

The reason I am posting this is that political identity is included. 
A question for candidates for non-partisan races often comes back to identifying candidates to a party, anyway.
Gun ownership is polarizing enough to drive people to be frank about their party affiliation.
To this point, I direct you to these two paragraphs:

Americans with a gun at home also differ politically from other adults. Republicans are twice as likely as Democrats to be members of a gun-owning household. Political independents also are more likely than Democrats to have a firearm in their homes.
Please read the article for more interesting information, and the entire study if you have an interest in the specific topic of gun ownership in America.
But on other dimensions tested in the survey, those with a gun at home differ little from other Americans. For example, they are as focused on health and fitness as those in non-gun owning households and are about equally likely to say they think of themselves as compassionate or as a trusting person.

I encourage you to ready the entire article, and the study.

The demographics and politics of gun-owning households | Pew Research Center



* Does your candidate view themselves as a Republican, Independent, Democrat? 

* Tea Party and Socialist Party charts would probably require an undefined 4th dimension; political space takes on quantum political dynamics where political positions bend back on themselves, overlapping, self-conflicting, and in parts completely non-existent to each other's position, depending on the topic, all at the same time and none of the time.
Bring a towel.

Public people

Good for job, unidentified public-ish person. It is inevitable for many people to do this. I have essentially done this with FB and Twitter. I have 34 FB friends (you twice), and a couple hundred twitter followers on two accounts.


Had I gone back for grad school it would have been on what you had just done. The theory went, when I graduated a few years ago: there are, as the law has defined and society accepted; public people, limited public people, and private people. With the advent of ubiquitous social media and the self-reviewing nature of social media everyone that participates will split their personas to fit some if not all three of the basic public spheres: public, limited public/private, private.


Newspapers, bloggers, anybody, have/has a right to report on your public life (almost all of it) if you are a politician, public performer, etc, that has accepted a public role. The families of these willing participants often become unwilling participants to some degree.


Newspapers, and employers, media companies, have a right to report about you in a very limited sense if you are the spouse of the SDOT director, or there was a crime at your house, but it pretty much has to stick to that scope.


Newspapers, and employers, media companies, do not have the right to report on a private person. No reporter has the right to randomly pick my name and do a biopic on somebody battling line needles in my rain gutters. We make google blur faces when they map streets.


With that, I started a blog and twitter account just for my anonymous notes on the Seattle City Council District 5's race. It's a public thing that separates me from being any more of a public person than I have to be.

There are people that follow me on this twitter feed that would never follow me on my personal account. I will not disappoint those folks by colliding those worlds.  


@sccd52015


http://sccd52015.blogspot.com


I know, blogs are dead, but they retain a useful and interconnected memory that Facebook and twitter just do not have.

Sunday, June 22, 2014

Transaction Politics that didn't work for Rod Dembowski

Rod Dembowski explained his plan that was vetoed by the King Council Executive Dow Constantine, to temporarily mitigate some cuts to Metro bus service in a lengthy letter to his constituents. Some of King County Council District 1 overlaps Seattle City Council's 5th Legislative District.

Dembowski proposed to spend money we do not have as a temporary funding solution. His bill was supported by four Republican councilmembers, one of which gained some Metro services in the political exchange. 
Transaction politics is not unusual, and sometimes can lead to mutually beneficial compromises, but in this case the overall policy was built on money we didn't actually have, not yet, maybe never, either way, unreliable.


On Jun 17, 2014, at 4:15 PM, King County Councilmember Rod Dembowski <District1enews@kingcounty.gov> wrote:

Dear Friend:

 

The County Council has been in the news in recent days, including last Friday's Seattle Times editorial, as we work to address the financial challenges facing Metro Transit.  I wanted to update you on our efforts to protect our riders, and grow the system in the future.  While this update is a little longer than normal, I want you to have the details on this important decision.

 

Over these past several months, the Council has deliberated over the best path forward to address the financial challenges facing Metro Transit. Through these deliberations, I have consistently held the position that we must exhaust all options to prevent draconian bus cuts that would devastate Metro workers and Metro transit riders who rely on our buses to get to work, school, the grocery store, and medical appointments. I listened carefully to the voters in April.  I believe voters want to invest to grow and strengthen Metro Transit, but want to see more of the good work we've done in recent years to improve its finances.

 

The County Executive proposed legislation that would cut 550,000 hours of bus service (16% of the system).  I strongly believe that we have a duty to the 200,000 people who rely on Metro each day, to look at every option before we disrupt their lives and their livelihoods.   We also owe this to the hundreds of transit workers whose family-wage jobs are on the line.   And, I feel that we need to respond to some of the questions voters have about Metro Transit's finances, so that we improve our odds of success for a future funding measure.

 

We live in one of the fastest growing regions in the country and we are fortunate that our economy has produced better than expected sales tax revenue ($31 million over Metro's adopted budget for 2014, and $32 million over 2015 projections).  Additionally, King County's Lean management efforts offer ongoing opportunities to identify additional cost savings and efficiencies at Metro.  For example, there is an effort underway right now to move towards just-in-time delivery practices for our $16 million parts inventory.  That will save money.  Efforts like that, as well as reviewing our capital expenditures and fund balance policies can keep more service online.  I also support adjusting our fare policies (e.g. reviewing discounts, paper transfers, and other options) to obtain new revenue to keep buses rolling. 

 

I introduced an Action Plan to move these ideas forward.  My colleagues agreed with me, and voted unanimously to support my legislation calling for a series of reform and revenue-raising steps between now and the fall budget season. This work includes:

 

• An independent audit of Metro's operations, finances and fund balance policies;

• Changing fare policies to increase revenue; and

• Reducing Metro's cost structure and establishing transparent peer comparison benchmarks.

 

This is not work without a purpose.  It will help us avoid many of the cuts now proposed.

 

A majority of my peers also voted in favor of part two of my plan: an ordinance implementing only the service reductions slated for September of this year, and delaying the 2015 cuts until we complete the work outlined above and adopt our budget this November.  

In my ordinance, the Fall 2014 routes were cut exactly as proposed by the County Executive.  We did ask for a report related to certain DART (Dial-a-Ride Transit) routes, which we authorized to be cut, as requested by the Executive.  DART service is contracted to HopeLink, and is the lowest per-hour cost service we provide.   Our amendment required that before those routes were cut, that Metro determine if those runs could be made more productive, or redeployed on other routes. 

Under my legislation, cuts proposed for 2015, if necessary, would be finalized after we complete our budget process for the next two years.  This is how we have always run Metro Transit in the past.  We adopt a budget, and set service levels accordingly.   Cutting service for 2015, today, before our budget work is done in November is, in my view, operating in the dark and ignores the many choices we have to keep buses rolling.

Unfortunately, this ordinance was vetoed by the County Executive.  

The Seattle Times, the League of Women Voters, Northwest Kidney Centers, Virginia Mason, elected officials across King County and hundreds of residents have voiced their support for my approach to preserve and grow our world class bus system. Metro is fundamental to our county's economic and environmental future. Severe cuts equate to severe disruption in the lives of many, which I cannot support without exhausting all other options.

After his veto, I called the County Executive and met with him to explore options on how we can move forward.  I believe that we share common goals: keep as many hours of service on the road, and be responsible fiscal stewards.   I am convinced that reasonable leaders can find a way to move forward together to achieve these objectives, and am working hard every day to do just that.

I would appreciate hearing your thoughts and ideas on the best path to move forward. Email or call me at rod.dembowski@kingcounty.gov or 206.477.1001. If you would like to contact other Councilmembers, there information can be found here.  If you would like to share your thoughts with the County Executive, his information can be found here

Thank you for your continued interest in this important topic. I will keep you updated as we continue our work.

Very Truly Yours,  

 <image001.jpg>

Rod Dembowski

King County Councilmember, District 1
Chair, Transportation, Economy & Environment Committee

516 3rd Avenue, Room 1200
Seattle, WA 98104
ph: (206) 477-1001 | fx: (206) 296-0198 
Visit our website for more information or to view the latest District 1 eNews

 

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Dembowski's bill vetoed

Tuesday Fizz: Based on Hopes and Prayers and Guesses | Seattle Met
King County Council District 1's Rod Dembowski got a bill passed to partially mitigate projected cuts to Metro by including in the budget projected increases in county revenue.
The bill was vetoed by King County Executive Dow Constantine because it relied on spending money we don't have.
The bill was opposed by four Democrats on the council, and supported by four Republicans.

Dembowski was originally appointed to the council by the Democrats.
Awkward.
You can reach Mr Dembowski here:

Publicola at Seattle Met had a brief on the situation in this morning's "Morning Fizz"

Tuesday Fizz: Based on Hopes and Prayers and Guesses

1. After getting smacked down by his Democratic colleagues on the King County Council yesterday afternoon for proposing legislation that would (temporarily) limit Metro cuts by raising fares, dipping into the agency's financial reserves, and directing the agency to "find efficiencies," through an audit, to forestall major bus cuts, North Seattle King County Council member Rob Dembowski, who passed the legislation at the contentious hearing by rounding up all the council Republicans to support it, got supremely smacked down by Democratic King County Executive Dow Constantine, who vetoed the legislation within the hour.

"We need a reliable way to pay for bus service—but until then, we shouldn't spend money we don't have, we shouldn't use one-time money to pay for ongoing expenses, and decisions to save or cut service should be based on objective criteria and data, not on politics," Constantine said in a statement. "This ordinance falls short on all counts."

Dembowski's proposal would have implemented only the cuts scheduled for September 2014; an alternative proposal by the council's other four Democrats would have implemented all the scheduled cuts, with the caveat that if Metro comes up with additional funding between now and 2015, only the first two rounds of cuts, in September of 2014 and February of 2015, would go forward."No one up here wants these cuts, but I believe it is fiscally irresponsible to budget based on what-ifs."

You can read the rest here: http://www.seattlemet.com/news-and-profiles/publicola/articles/fizz-for-june-10-june-2014

Transportation issues will be something that representatives for Seattle City Council District 5 will have to address.
The 2015 candidates should be aware of the varied needs of the different neighborhoods.

The level of service and the methods for funding for all modes of mobility need to be managed in a comprehensive way.